4 ms·

Did everyone miss the last line of the article and/or is everyone unaware of the fact this particular prosecutor has been suspended and is being investigated by

Did everyone miss the last line of the article and/or is everyone unaware of the fact this particular prosecutor has been suspended and is being investigated by the police for rape? Kind of pertinent to the story... His official work email was suspended because he's suspended from the organization...

cheema33 1y ago
> His official work email was suspended because he's suspended from the organization... At my organization, if an employee is suspended, I don't expect Microsoft to manage it. We have to do it ourselves. It is different elsewhere?
boston_clone 1y ago
Impertinent and disingenuous if you pay attention to the timeline; the EO was issued in February. The ICC has changed internal policies, and other members of the body sanctioned post-hoc have not had their email accounts suspended. The sexual misconduct allegations surfaced in May.
- dismalaf 1y ago
  The sexual assault allegations were reported internally at the ICC last year. Look at this article discussing the allegations, by AP, from last year: https://apnews.com/article/war-crimes-international-criminal-court-sexual-misconduct-metoo-7519d876decb945aafc2215756df19b2 https://apnews.com/article/war-crimes-international-criminal...
  - boston_clone 1y ago
    Thank you for providing that context. My follow up question is do you think that had any pertinence towards the issuance of that particular executive order and subsequent suspension of their email account? Or, is it perhaps a persuasive nugget put in there to lend mild credibility to what Trump is doing?
hk1337 1y ago
I missed it because it was at the very end so thanks for pointing it out. Sounds like Trump’s EO had nothing to do with with suspending the account? > Microsoft said the decision to suspend Mr. Khan’s email had been made in consultation with the I.C.C. The company said it had since enacted policy changes that had been in the works before the episode to protect customers in similar geopolitical situations in the future. When the Trump administration sanctioned four additional I.C.C. judges this month, their email accounts were not suspended, the company said.
- croes 1y ago
  > The company said it had since enacted policy changes that had been in the works before the episode to protect customers in similar geopolitical situations in the future. When the Trump administration sanctioned four additional I.C.C. judges this month, their email accounts were not suspended, the company said. That sounds exactly like it was because of Trump‘s EO but MS doesn’t want to do it anymore
- aaomidi 1y ago
  ICC could’ve suspended his email themselves if they wanted to. Microsoft corp didn’t need to be included.
croes 1y ago
Rape allegations? Reminds me of Assange. And he also lost his bank account, that’s hardly because of the allegations
pentamassiv 1y ago
He is not being investigated for rape. The article says "sexual misconduct"
- dismalaf 1y ago
  Read other articles about the accusations themselves. It's rape.
  - Disposal8433 1y ago
    [flagged]
    - dismalaf 1y ago
      https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/05/11/british-icc-chief-gazans-netanyahu-sex-abuse-allegations/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/05/11/british-ic... > New details allege that Mr Khan pressured the alleged victim, a Malaysian woman in her 30s, into what the Wall Street Journal described as “non-consensual sexual intercourse” on several occasions. Dunno what you think "non-consensual sexual intercourse" is...
      - canyp 1y ago
        Sexual misconduct is the classic scapegoat to take down people who cause trouble, see Assange. You still need to learn to read in between the lines. Also, since when does such a thing qualify for the takedown of an email account? Nor has he been convicted by a court or anything. Rule of law? The thought of knocking him out of his communications under these circumstances is absolutely ridiculous.
- deleted 1y ago
  [deleted]
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
aaomidi 1y ago
Even if so, do rapists not get email accounts anymore?

cheema33 1y ago

> His official work email was suspended because he's suspended from the organization... At my organization, if an employee is suspended, I don't expect Microsoft to manage it. We have to do it ourselves. It is different elsewhere?

boston_clone 1y ago

Impertinent and disingenuous if you pay attention to the timeline; the EO was issued in February. The ICC has changed internal policies, and other members of the body sanctioned post-hoc have not had their email accounts suspended. The sexual misconduct allegations surfaced in May.

dismalaf 1y ago
The sexual assault allegations were reported internally at the ICC last year. Look at this article discussing the allegations, by AP, from last year: https://apnews.com/article/war-crimes-international-criminal-court-sexual-misconduct-metoo-7519d876decb945aafc2215756df19b2 https://apnews.com/article/war-crimes-international-criminal...
- boston_clone 1y ago
  Thank you for providing that context. My follow up question is do you think that had any pertinence towards the issuance of that particular executive order and subsequent suspension of their email account? Or, is it perhaps a persuasive nugget put in there to lend mild credibility to what Trump is doing?

hk1337 1y ago

I missed it because it was at the very end so thanks for pointing it out. Sounds like Trump’s EO had nothing to do with with suspending the account? > Microsoft said the decision to suspend Mr. Khan’s email had been made in consultation with the I.C.C. The company said it had since enacted policy changes that had been in the works before the episode to protect customers in similar geopolitical situations in the future. When the Trump administration sanctioned four additional I.C.C. judges this month, their email accounts were not suspended, the company said.

croes 1y ago
> The company said it had since enacted policy changes that had been in the works before the episode to protect customers in similar geopolitical situations in the future. When the Trump administration sanctioned four additional I.C.C. judges this month, their email accounts were not suspended, the company said. That sounds exactly like it was because of Trump‘s EO but MS doesn’t want to do it anymore
aaomidi 1y ago
ICC could’ve suspended his email themselves if they wanted to. Microsoft corp didn’t need to be included.

croes 1y ago

Rape allegations? Reminds me of Assange. And he also lost his bank account, that’s hardly because of the allegations

pentamassiv 1y ago

He is not being investigated for rape. The article says "sexual misconduct"

dismalaf 1y ago
Read other articles about the accusations themselves. It's rape.
- Disposal8433 1y ago
  [flagged]
  - dismalaf 1y ago
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/05/11/british-icc-chief-gazans-netanyahu-sex-abuse-allegations/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/05/11/british-ic... > New details allege that Mr Khan pressured the alleged victim, a Malaysian woman in her 30s, into what the Wall Street Journal described as “non-consensual sexual intercourse” on several occasions. Dunno what you think "non-consensual sexual intercourse" is...
    - canyp 1y ago
      Sexual misconduct is the classic scapegoat to take down people who cause trouble, see Assange. You still need to learn to read in between the lines. Also, since when does such a thing qualify for the takedown of an email account? Nor has he been convicted by a court or anything. Rule of law? The thought of knocking him out of his communications under these circumstances is absolutely ridiculous.
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]

deleted 1y ago

[deleted]

aaomidi 1y ago

Even if so, do rapists not get email accounts anymore?