3 ms·
I wish articles like this would cite their sources. Here are two possible sources: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.241596 https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10
by herodotus 1y ago
I wish articles like this would cite their sources. Here are two possible sources:
https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.241596 https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.241596
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38940402/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38940402/
- kragen 1y agoThis site is the kind of malicious clickbaiter that publishes articles with titles like "The toothpaste ingredient that’s messing with your memory"; you can't expect them to have any concern for correctness or verifiability.
- refactor_master 1y ago“The heat dome survival guide meteorologists won’t tell you” Literally a meme at this point.
- santoshalper 1y agoYeah, I get that pop-sci writers don't want to scare off their audiences with hard science, but at least a callout with a couple of cited sources would help add a lot of credibility.
- rcstank 1y agoNot just a lot; any credibility. As it stands, the article is not credible at all.