3 ms·

Umm, you are mistaken. Yes, they found there was patent exhaustion. They also found that the patents were not infringed. Exhaustion is a completely separate is

by VanL 14y ago

Umm, you are mistaken. Yes, they found there was patent exhaustion. They also found that the patents were not infringed. Exhaustion is a completely separate issue from infringement.

cube13 14y ago
If they found that there was patent exhaustion, Apple could not have been guilty of infringing on the patents. The exhaustion doctrine is pretty clear on this.
- VanL 14y ago
  Patent exhaustion is about liability for infringement, not infringement itself.