5 ms·

I find it hard to discern whether your post is sarcasm. Assuming it’s not, I’m surprised that someone is so cheerfully and voluntarily paying an extra fiat to t

I find it hard to discern whether your post is sarcasm. Assuming it’s not, I’m surprised that someone is so cheerfully and voluntarily paying an extra fiat to the virtual landowner.

bobsmooth 1y ago
Video hosting is expensive. Making videos is expensive. You're not noble for stealing from Youtube or its creators.
- deleted 1y ago
  [deleted]
- asadotzler 1y ago
  It's not stealing. It's using. I have no obligation under any legal framework to use their content the way they wish I would. Trust me, or pay a lawyer to learn the same truth at considerably more cost.
  - bobsmooth 1y ago
    You're legally and morally in the wrong. Just accept this instead of getting defensive. I pirate literally all of the media I consume but I don't think I;m in the right for doing so.
    - pixxel 1y ago
      [dead]
- Lio 1y ago
  It's not stealing; no one is deprived of anything except rent. If anything the cost of making the video is sunk by the creator just once and then rapidily payed off. Once that happens it's just hosting costs and Moore's, Kryder's and Koomey's Laws are brining that down exponetially. Funnily enough though you never see the amount of avertising shown getting shorter to represent the lower costs involved eh?
  - bobsmooth 1y ago
    It costs money to serve video. You're stealing from YouTube and by extension creators. No amount of mental gymnastics will change this.
    - pixxel 1y ago
      [dead]
- trinix912 1y ago
  If it's costing YouTube so much, then they can freely switch to showing no videos to non-paying users at all. But they won't do that, because people watching without paying is what got them to where they are. As for the creators, it's up to them to decide whether they want to publish under these terms and risk having their content viewed without being paid for, or not put it on YouTube.
yugioh3 1y ago
Have you ever made a video before? It's actually quite a lot of work, especially if it's any good. Hours upon hours of time.
- trinix912 1y ago
  Think of it like you're a street musician. You put a basket on the floor, play your music, people go by, some might pay you, most won't. Is it wasted time? That's up to you to decide, then choose whether you want to keep doing that or not. If you want to charge for it directly, then sell tickets for a concert (put videos on Patreon).

I find it hard to discern whether your post is sarcasm. Assuming it’s not, I’m surprised that someone is so cheerfully and voluntarily paying an extra fiat to the virtual landowner.

bobsmooth 1y ago

Video hosting is expensive. Making videos is expensive. You're not noble for stealing from Youtube or its creators.

deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
asadotzler 1y ago
It's not stealing. It's using. I have no obligation under any legal framework to use their content the way they wish I would. Trust me, or pay a lawyer to learn the same truth at considerably more cost.
- bobsmooth 1y ago
  You're legally and morally in the wrong. Just accept this instead of getting defensive. I pirate literally all of the media I consume but I don't think I;m in the right for doing so.
  - pixxel 1y ago
    [dead]
Lio 1y ago
It's not stealing; no one is deprived of anything except rent. If anything the cost of making the video is sunk by the creator just once and then rapidily payed off. Once that happens it's just hosting costs and Moore's, Kryder's and Koomey's Laws are brining that down exponetially. Funnily enough though you never see the amount of avertising shown getting shorter to represent the lower costs involved eh?
- bobsmooth 1y ago
  It costs money to serve video. You're stealing from YouTube and by extension creators. No amount of mental gymnastics will change this.
  - pixxel 1y ago
    [dead]
trinix912 1y ago
If it's costing YouTube so much, then they can freely switch to showing no videos to non-paying users at all. But they won't do that, because people watching without paying is what got them to where they are. As for the creators, it's up to them to decide whether they want to publish under these terms and risk having their content viewed without being paid for, or not put it on YouTube.

yugioh3 1y ago

Have you ever made a video before? It's actually quite a lot of work, especially if it's any good. Hours upon hours of time.

trinix912 1y ago
Think of it like you're a street musician. You put a basket on the floor, play your music, people go by, some might pay you, most won't. Is it wasted time? That's up to you to decide, then choose whether you want to keep doing that or not. If you want to charge for it directly, then sell tickets for a concert (put videos on Patreon).