3 ms·
There are obvious winners and losers. Of course it is one sided if you dont care about the losers. Those who want to drive, not pay, and not take mass transit
by s1artibartfast 1y ago
There are obvious winners and losers. Of course it is one sided if you dont care about the losers.
Those who want to drive, not pay, and not take mass transit are losing out and nobody cares.
Im not saying anyone has to care, but I dont think it is honest to call it a free lunch.
- zahlman 1y ago"The measure is failing because people are less able to do the thing that the measure was specifically implemented to reduce" doesn't seem to me like a very convincing argument.
- s1artibartfast 1y agoWho are you quoting? I didn't say failing. Those are your words, not mine.
- wakawaka28 1y agoThe point is, there are obvious negative externalities to any intervention. It may be very effective at reducing congestion, at the cost of everyone's money and free time. If you can afford to pay all fees like nothing then it only improves your quality of life.