4 ms·
What do others think of Hogan's patent? http://www.google.com/patents/US7352953 http://www.google.com/patents/US7352953 It strikes me as just recording video
by jedbrown 14y ago
What do others think of Hogan's patent?
http://www.google.com/patents/US7352953 http://www.google.com/patents/US7352953
It strikes me as just recording video and doing the standard things that people do with digital video.
- danielweber 14y agoOh, good, a lynch mob to attack the foreman's professional work.
- harshreality 14y agoMore like a demonstration of just what kind of flawed mindset he may have on patents, given that he holds such a silly patent. It appears to be, essentially, a DVR patent. I'm very concerned with his ability to handle a case like this since he thought something very similar to a TIVO (1999) was patentable when his patent was filed in 2002.
- mturmon 14y agoDid Samsung get a chance to reject jurors in a voir dire process, as one does for a criminal trial? If so, it's hard to complain about the jurors after the fact.
- kaffiene 14y agoIf the foreman of the jury acted as an self-appointed expert and the jury was swayed by that, then that's grounds for appeal in itself. This is all in the Groklaw article - did you read it?