3 ms·
> "net positive" requires a human being existing to judge. This is effectively a religious belief you are espousing.
by bayarearefugee 1y ago
> "net positive" requires a human being existing to judge.
This is effectively a religious belief you are espousing.
- adastra22 1y agoWhat do you mean? Religion seems like a total nonsequitur here. If anything I would argue the opposite: you would need religion or something like it for moral statements to have any meaning without the existence of sentient beings.