+1 I do love a good js rant! For a stark comparison, consider the site where these comments are entered. HN Rulz! No js, no problem! Fast and functional... A

+1 I do love a good js rant! For a stark comparison, consider the site where these comments are entered. HN Rulz! No js, no problem! Fast and functional... And regarding the comment: > it loads 754kB of JS across 13 requests It didn't for me, since I browse by default with javascript and cookies disabled. The site jonoalderson.com worked just fine without them. I'm not sure why more technically literate people don't do this...