Define "good" and see if the question still makes sense. If we define it to mean "fit for the purpose declared as its basis for funding," then either high-dolla

Define "good" and see if the question still makes sense. If we define it to mean "fit for the purpose declared as its basis for funding," then either high-dollar-value fraud is so prevalent in this industry as to qualify it for comparison with Scientology and other MLMs, or the industry simply cannot be attempting in fact to do what it claims to be trying to do. Which might amount to the same. For that matter, how do you know good software really doesn't last centuries? The practice of software's creation has yet to see its hundredth birthday. We have quite literally not had time to tell, and early results seem suggestive in really either direction.