3 ms·
That's a very reasonable point. Could there perhaps be a middle ground by requiring interoperability and conformance with standards? By way of analogy, I'm sur
by harimau777 1y ago
That's a very reasonable point. Could there perhaps be a middle ground by requiring interoperability and conformance with standards?
By way of analogy, I'm sure that the vast majority of people purchase their appliances from a couple of big brands. However, because the various hookups are standardized, there is still a reasonably large market of alternatives. Similarly, early in the internet most people used, for example, AOL Instand Messenger; however, due to interopperability it wasn't unheard of for someone to use something like Trillian.
I'm sure that wouldn't be enough to fully solve the problem of big tech having too much power, but it would probably significantly help.
- ethbr1 1y agoThe problem with standards is that they're incredibly slow to change and bad for quickly evolving use cases. E.g. IRC They've been more successful when they're limited, generic, and allow for up- and downstream innovation. E.g. HTTP
- ForHackernews 1y agoI'm not sure that everything-over-HTTPS has been a great success, but I take your point.
- ethbr1 1y agoI'd say that everything-over-HTTPS proves its success! It's good enough for most use cases, and a more efficient (and complex) standard wouldn't have been as generalizable.