4 ms·
I find your argument disingenuous, the website is still usable with JS disabled and it's obvious the article is talking about JS-heavy websites that could do wi
by Zealotux 1y ago
I find your argument disingenuous, the website is still usable with JS disabled and it's obvious the article is talking about JS-heavy websites that could do without it, not advocating for a complete anti-JS stance. It also uses HTTP3 is seems, so making 13 separate requests isn't much of an issue, it has a good performance score which is almost surprising for a Wordpress website.
- nchmy 1y agoWhy is good performance surprising for WordPress? It's just html, and I assume it is fully cached since it's not a site that has login, dynamic stuff (that's when WordPress becomes a big problem, but can be surmounted).