43 ms·
> they do it in tendentious disquisitions that take thousands of wasted words to get.. to.. the.. everloving.. point. Right, and "actual philosophers" like Sar
by achenet 1y ago
> they do it in tendentious disquisitions that take thousands of wasted words to get.. to.. the.. everloving.. point.
Right, and "actual philosophers" like Sartre and Heidegger _never_ did that. Ever.
"Being and Nothingness" and "Being and Time" are both short enough to fit into a couple tweets, right?
</irony>
- timmytokyo 1y agoThanks for reminding me that I left out their unjustified sense of significance and self-importance, thinking that their sophomoric ramblings are somehow comparable to Sartre's or Heidegger's writings.
- chipsrafferty 1y agoI mean, I see the parallels. Heidegger was a Nazi, similar to how LWers are racist/eugenicists/Zionists.