> What would a Kubernetes 2.0 look like A lot simpler hopefully. It never really took off but docker swarm had a nice simplicity to it. Right idea, but Docker

> What would a Kubernetes 2.0 look like A lot simpler hopefully. It never really took off but docker swarm had a nice simplicity to it. Right idea, but Docker Inc. mismanaged it. Unfortunately, Kubernetes evolved into a bit of a monster. Designed to be super complicated. Full of pitfalls. In need of vast amounts of documentation, training, certification, etc. Layers and layers of complexity, hopelessly overengineered. I.e. lots of expensive hand holding. My mode with technology is that if the likes of Red Hat, IBM, etc. get really excited: run away. Because they are seeing lots of dollars for exactly the kind of stuff I don't want in my life. Leaving Kubernetes 2.0 to the people that did 1.0 is probably just going to lead to more of the same. The people behind this require this to be a combination of convoluted and hard to use. That's how they make money. If it was easy, they'd be out of business.