3 ms·
Cemetery plots or stents, if you can trust the Science E. g., https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Journal-Scans/2025/03/24/13/52/Cannabis-Use-Substantial
by readthenotes1 1y ago
Cemetery plots or stents, if you can trust the Science
E. g.,
https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Journal-Scans/2025/03/24/13/52/Cannabis-Use-Substantially-Increases-Risk-of-Heart-Attack-acc-2025 https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Journal-Scans/2025/...
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/cannabis-use-cardiovascular-disease-death-risk#Cannabis-and-heart-health https://www.healthline.com/health-news/cannabis-use-cardiova...
- naruhodo 1y agoI've seen the same study reported in non-science media today as well. As is established tradition, the scientists did a meta-analysis of studies that did not control for method of administration. (Your second link - healthline - notes that: "There was no delineation in the analysis, however, on the risks of smoking cannabis compared to ingesting it."). I have yet to see any evidence that edibles or dry-herb vaporisers have the same harms as smoking. I have absolutely no problem with believing that smoking cannabis is harmful. There is clearly value in warning people about smoking cannabis. However, I would like to see some nuance around method of administration. I will continue to treat my health issues with oil-based tinctures and the occasional bit of dry-herb vaped flower.
- rusk 1y agoSurprised that after all these years we still have to point out “correlation is not causation”