3 ms·
Huh? They give millions of dollars to global humanitarian development funds saving at least 50,000 lives per year. Maybe you’re taking a few kooks who have a co
by therealdrag0 1y ago
Huh? They give millions of dollars to global humanitarian development funds saving at least 50,000 lives per year. Maybe you’re taking a few kooks who have a controversial lecture somewhere as representing everyone else.
- creatonez 1y agoIt is true that there were EAs before the conception of "longtermism" that were relatively mundane and actually helping humanity, and not part of a death cult. But those have been shunned from the EA movement for a while now.
- comp_throw7 1y agoGlobal Health & Development is like 40% of EA funding today. Please stop making things up.
- lechatonnoir 1y agoI think you're conflating different groups of people pretty severely. "shunned" in particular is a really strong word, e.g, global health and biosecurity are two of the named categories at the most central EA events: https://www.effectivealtruism.org/ea-global/events/ea-global-new-york-city-2025 https://www.effectivealtruism.org/ea-global/events/ea-global...