This analysis seems wrong for at least a couple of reasons. 1. Freight is easier to manage and has better economics on a dedicated network. The US freight netw

This analysis seems wrong for at least a couple of reasons. 1. Freight is easier to manage and has better economics on a dedicated network. The US freight network is extremely efficient as others have pointed out. Other networks, e.g., Germany, instead prioritized passenger service. In Germany rail moves a small proportion of freight (19%) compared to trucks. [0] It's really noticeable on the Autobahn and unlike the US where a lot of truck traffic is intermodal loads. 2. The US could have better rail service by investing in passenger networks. Instead we have boondoggles like the California high-speed rail project which has already burned through 10s of billions of dollars with no end in sight. [1] Or the New Jersey Transit system which I had the pleasure to ride on earlier today to Newark Airport. It has pretty good coverage but needs investment. [0] https://dhl-freight-connections.com/en/trends/global-freight-transport-statistics-international-europe-and-germany/ https://dhl-freight-connections.com/en/trends/global-freight... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_Rail https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_Rail