Where in the article do the authors say this puts anything to rest? Here is their conclusion: > Our results complicate current disputes over copyright infringe

Where in the article do the authors say this puts anything to rest? Here is their conclusion: > Our results complicate current disputes over copyright infringement, both by rejecting easy claims made by both sides about how models work and by demonstrating that there is no single answer to the question of how much a model memorizes I wonder if this is the sort of article that people will claim supports their side, even that it ends the debate without a knockout blow to the other side, when the actual article itself isn't making any such claim. I'm sure you read the entire article before commenting, but I would strongly recommend everyone else does as well.