3 ms·
That's only one flaw in the theory. There are others, such as the unproven, narcissistic and frankly unlikely-to-be-true assumption that humanity continuing to
by bayarearefugee 1y ago
That's only one flaw in the theory.
There are others, such as the unproven, narcissistic and frankly unlikely-to-be-true assumption that humanity continuing to exist is a net positive in the long run.
- christophilus 1y agoA net positive for whom?
- bayarearefugee 1y agoEverything. of which humanity is a miniscule part.
- adastra22 1y ago"net positive" requires a human being existing to judge.
- bayarearefugee 1y ago> "net positive" requires a human being existing to judge. This is effectively a religious belief you are espousing.
- adastra22 1y agoWhat do you mean? Religion seems like a total nonsequitur here. If anything I would argue the opposite: you would need religion or something like it for moral statements to have any meaning without the existence of sentient beings.