> That's a strawman argument. At no point did I "attack the community for not ever showing a sense of maybe being wrong or uncertain". Ok, let's scroll up the

> That's a strawman argument. At no point did I "attack the community for not ever showing a sense of maybe being wrong or uncertain". Ok, let's scroll up the thread. When I refer to "the specific criticism that I quoted", and when you say "implying that because they say and do these things, they must be immune from the criticism delivered above": what do you think was the "criticism delivered above"? Because I thought we were talking about contrarian1234's claim to exactly this "strawman", and you so far have not appeared to not agree with me that this criticism was invalid.