4 ms·
> There’s no good way to solve this, though. Yes there is! Just get rid of it. It's useless. The re-implementation from using one to the other was barely a few
by ToucanLoucan 1y ago
> There’s no good way to solve this, though.
Yes there is! Just get rid of it. It's useless. The re-implementation from using one to the other was barely a few moments of work, and even if you want to say "well that's a breaking change" I mean, yeah? Then break it. I would be far less annoyed if a function was just removed and Xcode went "hey this is pointed at nothing, gotta sort that" rather than letting it run in a way that turns the use of authentication functionality into a landmine.
- lazide 1y agoI take it you’ve never had to support a widely used publicly available API? You might be bound to support these calls for many, many years.