3 ms·
Has to be wrong. I'm on that subscription as I wanted to reinforce my opinion that it's still shit for devs that actually have experience, like it was a few mon
by ffsm8 1y ago
Has to be wrong. I'm on that subscription as I wanted to reinforce my opinion that it's still shit for devs that actually have experience, like it was a few months ago.
While my plan didn't pan out, cuz it was way too effective, I can confidently say that I'm going through 3-6k tokens per prompt on average, and usually get around 3 hours of usage before I'm hitting the rate limit.
The limit is probably closer to 300k then <10k
Also the chat interface doesn't have a separate limit, once you hit it via Claude code, you cannot use the website either anymore.
Maybe it's a 7k limit per prompt? Dunno if I exceeded that before
- cmrdporcupine 1y agoI found I can hit the limit very quickly if I have it scan large quantities of code for analysis. If I try to be more surgical, and give it terse but accurate documentation and instructions, the budget lasts longer.
- vitro 1y agoSame here. Sometimes I direct it just to specific files related to the feature requested.
- blitzar 1y agoClaude Code is chugging away on a step (6/10) for me right now: Transforming… (212s · 26.1k tokens · esc to interrupt) I reset just under 2 hours ago, probably been going at this pace for the last hour or so.
- cchance 1y ago7k is literally nothing, even for a trial 7k of token is basically 1-2 files written that doesn't seem right if it is then i dont see why anyone would pay for that and not the 250 prompts/month from augment or one of the others
- throwaway314155 1y agoI hadn't even heard of augment, but Claude Code's UX is _mostly_ very nice (despite the problematic UX this particular project attempts to solve). So perhaps Claude Code has a better UI/UX?