3 ms·
It kind of does make sense, like a Library would use the books at its disposal. But what is not normal is that they will easily block, ban and sue you if you t
by greatgib 1y ago
It kind of does make sense, like a Library would use the books at its disposal.
But what is not normal is that they will easily block, ban and sue you if you try to do the same, like if the catalog of content was belonging to them.
- echoangle 1y agoDoes it not? Do you not give those rights to YouTube once you upload a video?
- throwaway29843 1y agoNot all YouTube videos are uploaded by their rightholders though. There's plenty of stuff reuploaded from other platforms, which Google is feeding into their AI indiscriminately.
- kube-system 1y ago> It kind of does make sense, like a Library would use the books at its disposal. Libraries don't really "use" books to produce anything, except to support accessibility like translations or indexing. Their lending of books is under the first-sale doctrine, which wouldn't be applicable to YouTube videos streamed under license. > But what is not normal is that they will easily block, ban and sue you if you try to do the same, like if the catalog of content was belonging to them. Because they do have rights to the content. All of the content on YouTube has been licensed to YouTube, and the licensor has assigned some rights to them.