4 ms·
> These scanned folks likely are using AI wrong. This feels like victim blaming. If the tool can be so easily misused that the participants in this study "use
by probably_wrong 1y ago
> These scanned folks likely are using AI wrong.
This feels like victim blaming.
If the tool can be so easily misused that the participants in this study "used it wrong" by default, then were are the safeguards? How are these companies nudging the users in the "right" direction?
The way I see it, if there's nothing in the system telling you that you're using it "wrong" then you're using it exactly as intended.
- incomingpain 1y agoA hammer can be so easily misused in that you can try to knock in nails using the claw side. How come nobody is telling them to use the other side? If the hammer doesnt have instructions on the side to say to use the hammer side, then it's being used exactly as intended.
- probably_wrong 1y agoI have seen here and there people try to use the wrong side of a hammer, usually either small children or people with no experience at all using hammers. But the second you show them the right way it sticks: the sides are visually different and, more important, the right side works better. What I've never seen in my life is a random group of 9 people (per the study) where all of them consistently use the wrong side of the hammer repeatedly across four sessions.