3 ms·
I do care: I want copyright gutted. It was meant as a short-term incentive, not a century-long monopoly. Moreover, a lot of the copyright lawsuits are trying t
by bradley13 1y ago
I do care: I want copyright gutted. It was meant as a short-term incentive, not a century-long monopoly.
Moreover, a lot of the copyright lawsuits are trying to restrict fair use - and that definitely includes AI "reading" a work or "looking" at a picture.
- Arainach 1y ago>and that definitely includes AI "reading" a work or "looking" at a picture. "Reading" or making a full copy? The examples over and over of these models generating full clones are rather damning.
- alganet 1y agoI think you're wrong, and copyright law is the unexpected ally of the people in this matter. Big studios already got their death sentence. Smaller independent productions, even individuals, will get the larger slice of the pie eventually. This shift is already happening. Pretend you're a small producer working on something for years. A YouTube series or something. Then an AI company ingests your content and outpaces you, reproducing your style (either directly or "serving it as electricity" to others, while making money off of it). That is a nightmare scenario for culture. Training data hungry AI should not be able to eat whatever they want. We need this precedent to be set, it will be important. And big studios are going to die anyway, AI or not, no reason to fear monopoly. Let's use their sacrifice to estabilish good laws for the small fish.