3 ms·
Sure, they're represented as objects in the JVM, and you can access this via refection; but they're not treated as objects in Java's syntax. I'd argue that OOP
by weavejester 18y ago
Sure, they're represented as objects in the JVM, and you can access this via refection; but they're not treated as objects in Java's syntax. I'd argue that OOP is a property of a language's syntax, rather than how it is internally represented.