I think the issue is that a person reading without an interlocutor has a better chance of getting some truth from the sum of the bill than reading with an “expe

I think the issue is that a person reading without an interlocutor has a better chance of getting some truth from the sum of the bill than reading with an “expert” bent on swaying them towards a fringe interpretation or even directly lying to distort the content. The feature lets them put on an air of factuality but really just inveigle people with a chopped take on a document.