27 ms·
I think that Andrej presents “Software 3.0” as a revolution, but in essence it is a natural evolution of abstractions. Abstractions don't eliminate the need to
by dmitrijbelikov 1y ago
I think that Andrej presents “Software 3.0” as a revolution, but in essence it is a natural evolution of abstractions.
Abstractions don't eliminate the need to understand the underlying layers - they just hide them until something goes wrong.
Software 3.0 is a step forward in convenience. But it is not a replacement for developers with a foundation, but a tool for acceleration, amplification and scaling.
If you know what is under the hood — you are irreplaceable.
If you do not know — you become dependent on a tool that you do not always understand.
- poorcedural 1y agoFoundational programmers form the base of where the seed can grow. In a way programmers found where our roots grow, they can not find your limits. Software 3.0 is a step into a different light, where software finds its own limits. If we know where they are rooted, we will merge their best attempts. Only because we appreciate their resultant behavior.
- dmitrijbelikov 1y agoThe software does nothing but what you tell it to do. And if you can't figure out the limits, then it's probably a personal problem that you haven't solved for yourself yet.