5 ms·

They wont its another marketing scam by the admin lol, promise shit now, don't deliver reap benefits till the public/admin forgets, you dont actually have to do

They wont its another marketing scam by the admin lol, promise shit now, don't deliver reap benefits till the public/admin forgets, you dont actually have to do shit you just have to say you will same as the last time

chaosbolt 1y ago
[flagged]
- ourmandave 1y ago
  But if we don't defend the 51st State of Israel, we'll never get Canada and Greenland to join.
  - lostlogin 1y ago
    Was the parent post referring to Israel or Russia?
    - freedomben 1y ago
      I would guess they are referring to Iran
      - NoMoreNicksLeft 1y ago
        Gaza, if I'm not completely lost.
    - mensetmanusman 1y ago
      Probably Iran, but they also probably want to support Ukraine.
      - LPisGood 1y ago
        I think drawing a parallel between those situations is odd. One is a war of aggression, one is of defense. One where American military action is being considered, one is not.
        yadaeno 1y ago
        Iran has been attacking Israel for 50 years through proxies. I don’t think it’s a clear “attack vs defense”. Also now is the time to deal with Iran and restore a sane government before they have a chance to add nukes to the equation.
        lostlogin 1y ago
        > One is a war of aggression, one is of defense. It’s semantics though isn’t it? To the civilian casualty the inbound rocket is an aggressive attack.
        mensetmanusman 1y ago
        One could say that if one didn’t believe Hamas was funded by Iran.
        inemesitaffia 1y ago
        They know. In the end it's just judenhass
    - chaosbolt 1y ago
      Akshually I was referring to Qatar, but if you deny it then you're an antiqatarite, and you literally condone the destruction of Tatooine and its 6 million habitants.
  - elzbardico 1y ago
    Not the 51st State. It is more like our Colonial Metropolis. We just need to pay tribute and keep quiet about it. Occasionally the tribute must be paid with the blood of our young, in order to allow our colonial master to most effectively genocide their neighbors
ryukoposting 1y ago
I find that the easiest way to suss out corporate political advertisements is to look for how they refer to the federal government. If they say "federal government" or "$NAME_OF_ACT" then there's usually at least an inkling of intent behind whatever they say next. If they say "$PRESIDENT administration" or "$PARTY_NAME," you can be certain you're reading a political advertisement.
no_wizard 1y ago
Much like when the administration announced an investment of 500 Billion USD in AI some months back, not a peep since. Actually shocked nobody here has even referenced that in relation to this, at least at the time of this writing Much like that “initiative”, I imagine this won’t materialize either, they’re largely hoping government funds get steered toward them and by which point they’ll pocket everything they can while delivering a minimum of what was promised, if anything at all, and they won’t be properly held accountable for it.
- nightski 1y ago
  I have no desire to defend the admin, but that was not what was announced at all. It was announced that OpenAI/Oracle/Softbank were investing $500B, which they are. It had nothing to do with government spending.
  - jazzypants 1y ago
    Trump announced it at the White House. He wants credit for everything while doing nothing. https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/trump-announce-private-sector-ai-infrastructure-investment-cbs-reports-2025-01-21/ https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/t...
    - ahmeneeroe-v2 1y ago
      What's your point? The question was about gov spending, not political antics.
- llm_nerd 1y ago
  >Much like when the administration announced an investment of 500 Billion USD in AI some months back That was a project by Oracle to build some data centres, many of which had already broke ground and were under construction, and they pulled OpenAI and Softbank in to give it that AI veneer. So it's stuff that is really happening, and was already happening. Similarly this TI plant was announced under the prior administration as a win of the chips act, and again it's being recycled to current. This sort of shell game works for a while, but a couple of years the bill comes due.

chaosbolt 1y ago

[flagged]

ourmandave 1y ago
But if we don't defend the 51st State of Israel, we'll never get Canada and Greenland to join.
- lostlogin 1y ago
  Was the parent post referring to Israel or Russia?
  - freedomben 1y ago
    I would guess they are referring to Iran
    - NoMoreNicksLeft 1y ago
      Gaza, if I'm not completely lost.
  - mensetmanusman 1y ago
    Probably Iran, but they also probably want to support Ukraine.
    - LPisGood 1y ago
      I think drawing a parallel between those situations is odd. One is a war of aggression, one is of defense. One where American military action is being considered, one is not.
      - yadaeno 1y ago
        Iran has been attacking Israel for 50 years through proxies. I don’t think it’s a clear “attack vs defense”. Also now is the time to deal with Iran and restore a sane government before they have a chance to add nukes to the equation.
      - lostlogin 1y ago
        > One is a war of aggression, one is of defense. It’s semantics though isn’t it? To the civilian casualty the inbound rocket is an aggressive attack.
      - mensetmanusman 1y ago
        One could say that if one didn’t believe Hamas was funded by Iran.
        inemesitaffia 1y ago
        They know. In the end it's just judenhass
  - chaosbolt 1y ago
    Akshually I was referring to Qatar, but if you deny it then you're an antiqatarite, and you literally condone the destruction of Tatooine and its 6 million habitants.
- elzbardico 1y ago
  Not the 51st State. It is more like our Colonial Metropolis. We just need to pay tribute and keep quiet about it. Occasionally the tribute must be paid with the blood of our young, in order to allow our colonial master to most effectively genocide their neighbors

ryukoposting 1y ago

I find that the easiest way to suss out corporate political advertisements is to look for how they refer to the federal government. If they say "federal government" or "$NAME_OF_ACT" then there's usually at least an inkling of intent behind whatever they say next. If they say "$PRESIDENT administration" or "$PARTY_NAME," you can be certain you're reading a political advertisement.

no_wizard 1y ago

Much like when the administration announced an investment of 500 Billion USD in AI some months back, not a peep since. Actually shocked nobody here has even referenced that in relation to this, at least at the time of this writing Much like that “initiative”, I imagine this won’t materialize either, they’re largely hoping government funds get steered toward them and by which point they’ll pocket everything they can while delivering a minimum of what was promised, if anything at all, and they won’t be properly held accountable for it.

nightski 1y ago
I have no desire to defend the admin, but that was not what was announced at all. It was announced that OpenAI/Oracle/Softbank were investing $500B, which they are. It had nothing to do with government spending.
- jazzypants 1y ago
  Trump announced it at the White House. He wants credit for everything while doing nothing. https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/trump-announce-private-sector-ai-infrastructure-investment-cbs-reports-2025-01-21/ https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/t...
  - ahmeneeroe-v2 1y ago
    What's your point? The question was about gov spending, not political antics.
llm_nerd 1y ago
>Much like when the administration announced an investment of 500 Billion USD in AI some months back That was a project by Oracle to build some data centres, many of which had already broke ground and were under construction, and they pulled OpenAI and Softbank in to give it that AI veneer. So it's stuff that is really happening, and was already happening. Similarly this TI plant was announced under the prior administration as a win of the chips act, and again it's being recycled to current. This sort of shell game works for a while, but a couple of years the bill comes due.