6 ms·
microservices and mono repo are not mutually exclusive. Monolith, is. Important distinction imo, Micro services in mono repo definitely works and ime is >>> mul
by nothrabannosir 1y ago
microservices and mono repo are not mutually exclusive. Monolith, is. Important distinction imo, Micro services in mono repo definitely works and ime is >>> multi repo.
Of course the best is mono repo and monolith :3
- npodbielski 1y agoI did not stated that they can be used together. I just meant that they are mainly, for me, work as a tool to allow multiple teams work on a single big project. So the tool is more for work organisation purpose not for architectural one. If you prefer working on mono repo it s fine though I think micro services are more popular one now.
- nothrabannosir 1y agoAm I reading it wrong ? I understand both your original comment and this one to paint mono repo as an alternative to micro services. E.g.: “ What is the alternative [to micro services]? Mono-repo?” and “ If you prefer working on mono repo it s fine though I think micro services are more popular one now.” What I understand here is that “mono repo is an alternative to micro services”. Is that what you’re saying? If so: mono repo is not an alternative to micro services. You can have both. You can have micro services in a mono repo. One single repository with many micro services. That is possible. What is an alternative to micro services is “monolith”. Curious how I’m misunderstanding this because I looked at it for a while and I really don’t see it.