2 ms·
I feel like I missed a preread that teaches me about these strangle super-numeric ip addresses. Eg 400.564.987.500 Am I just seeing ipv6 in an unusually famili
by jojohohanon 1y ago
I feel like I missed a preread that teaches me about these strangle super-numeric ip addresses. Eg 400.564.987.500
Am I just seeing ipv6 in an unusually familiar format? Or is it an intentionally malformed format used by wireguard for internal routing?
- cameroncooper 1y agoLooks like modified placeholder addresses because the author didn't want to use real addresses. I don't think it could be used for internal routing since each octet is represented with a single byte (0-255) so having larger numbers for some internal routing would likely break the entire IP stack.
- Arrowmaster 1y agoYes the author needs to be beaten over the head with RFC 5737.