Climate change is one of Rupert Murdoch's pet projects. The motivation for this article is nothing more than a positive performance review for David Byers. Co

Climate change is one of Rupert Murdoch's pet projects. The motivation for this article is nothing more than a positive performance review for David Byers. Consider the first line "America's top scientists have admitted that the calculations ... were flawed" It's phrased as though the scientists were activly hiding the truth, pushing some secret agenda, rather than making a mistake. Line 2, "Climatologists ... have been forced to revise their estimations". what? at gunpoint? Science is great because of objectivity. Any random guy can point out mistakes, and "Climatologists at Nasa's Goddard Institute of Space Science" will listen to him. The timesonline is nowhere near objective. Beware this article as a source, Its internal bias will mess with your ability to consider the quality of evidence.