4 ms·
For context - I was in the audience when Karpathy gave this amazing talk on software 3.0. YC has said the official video will take a few weeks to release, by wh
by pudiklubi 1y ago
For context - I was in the audience when Karpathy gave this amazing talk on software 3.0. YC has said the official video will take a few weeks to release, by which Karpathy himself said the talk will be deprecated.
https://x.com/karpathy/status/1935077692258558443 https://x.com/karpathy/status/1935077692258558443
- levocardia 1y agoTo complete the loop, we need an AI avatar of Karpathy doing text-to-voice from the transcript. Who says AI can't boost productivity!
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- msgodel 1y agoI listened to it with an old fashion CMU speech synth.
- chrisweekly 1y agoDo the talk's predictions about the future of the industry project beyond a few weeks? If so, I'd expect the salient points of the talk to remain valid. Hmm...
- swyx 1y agoi synced the slides with the talk transcript here : https://latent.space/s3 https://latent.space/s3
- pudiklubi 1y agoso you took my transcript and put it behind a newsletter sub? haha. just share them!
- swyx 1y agonot quite, i compiled the slides within a few hours of the talk yesterday well before your transcript was available. the slides are my main output/contribution. a full slides+transcript is too long for substack. i've linked your transcript prominently for people to find, and used it to fix slide ordering because twitter people took terrible notes for the purpose of exact talk reconstruction. i exepct YC to prioritize publishing this talk so propbably the half life of any of this work is measured in days anyway. 100% of our podcast is published for free, but we still have ~1000 people who choose to support our work with a subscription (it does help pay for editors, equipment, and travel). I always feel bad that we dont have much content for them so i figured i'd put just the slide compilation up for subscribers. i'm trying to find nice ways to ramp up value for our subs over time, mostly by showing "work in progress" things like this that i had to do anyway to summarize/internalize the talk properly - which again is what we published entirely free/no subscription required
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- pudiklubi 1y agogotcha. def a good idea! i'm only a bit wary of making all of this a bit too put together, as to create an official source before there is one. that being said, HN is a negative place, and not what I was trying to go for. thank you for your work with the slides!
- dang 1y agoLet's all make HN a less negative place. (As a step towards making it a non-negative place.)
- fellatio 1y agoLooks like you are putting a derivative behind a paywall though, no? I think quid pro quo let pudiklubi publish your work too? Some kind of open license?
- swyx 1y ago
- theyinwhy 1y agoWhat a poor judgement he must have if his outlook becomes irrelevant in a few weeks' time. Edit: the emoji at the end of the original sentence has not been quoted. How a smile makes the difference. Original tweet: https://x.com/karpathy/status/1935077692258558443 https://x.com/karpathy/status/1935077692258558443
- theturtletalks 1y agoIt was in jest, more a take of how quickly things move in AI
- qwertox 1y agoWe better stop talking about the future then.
- scottyah 1y agoEvery time you talk about the future, it gets altered.
- amarait 1y agoHard determinists would disagree
- koakuma-chan 1y agoEven if universe is not deterministic, what he said still does not make sense because him talking about future is part of destiny.
- addaon 1y agoThey basically have to.
- pudiklubi 1y agothe way I read it it's more about how fast examples and references become irrelevant. fundamentals of the speech not.