3 ms·
What don't you understand? It defies conventional color science and is steeped in the esoteric knowledge of the early 20th century. It is a very nice palette g
by caseyohara 1y ago
What don't you understand? It defies conventional color science and is steeped in the esoteric knowledge of the early 20th century.
It is a very nice palette generator, but I really dislike all the talk of magic/mysticism/sorcery/witchcraft. It's a dang color generator, ease up on the dungeon master language.
- macrocosmos 1y agoIt defies explanation. This is followed up by an explantation.
- cardiffspaceman 1y agoDefied unsuccessfully.
- nemomarx 1y agoIt feels a little bit ai generated there, or maybe just padded out marketing copy - more adjectives and superlatives than I'd expect from a technical site at least. Telling you how to call it to get a "mesmerizing" palette for example I can handle some purple mysticism prose but I did want like a comparison of a few palettes from this polar system vs some traditional plane ones. If the creator reads this thread that's my note
- epiccoleman 1y agoon the other hand, i like the "theme" - i'm a sucker for that mix of "wizardry" metaphor with programming stuff. I'm reminded for instance of this fun little post: https://aphyr.com/posts/341-hexing-the-technical-interview https://aphyr.com/posts/341-hexing-the-technical-interview
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- qmmmur 1y agoWhy do you feel so strongly that someone shouldn't invent a tool/doohickey/fun experience that isn't purely based around being a utility? The creator of this isn't taking away from the plethora of already available "conventional colour science" orientated tools.
- nemomarx 1y agoI don't feel strongly about that at all? I was saying I didn't understand from the description what's actually different between this tool and the conventional ones and I wanted some information there about that. A compare / contrast example would have worked nicely.