3 ms·
It sounds like the quality is better than YouTube's. > a game changer for anyone who uses voice transcription to create text from lectures, podcasts, YouTube v
by GeekyBear 1y ago
It sounds like the quality is better than YouTube's.
> a game changer for anyone who uses voice transcription to create text from lectures, podcasts, YouTube videos, and more... generating transcripts that I upload to YouTube because the site’s built-in transcription isn’t very good.
and on par with Whisper.
> SpeechAnalyzer and SpeechTranscriber – available across the iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Vision Pro – mark a significant leap forward in transcription speed without compromising on quality
- eviks 1y agoHow much better?
- 6510 1y agoAll I know is that the most obvious room for improvement in yt transcription is that it will regularly get words wrong that are mentioned 50 times or may even be spelled out in the title or description of the video. If there are many thousands of clues the video is about [say] LLM's it shouldn't be necessary to endlessly fail to spell "chat GPT"