4 ms·

Its lawyers forcing copyright to stay alive. But it isn't sustainable is what I mean. A lot of TV is free now (with ads), media is less profitable using their

Its lawyers forcing copyright to stay alive. But it isn't sustainable is what I mean. A lot of TV is free now (with ads), media is less profitable using their old system. The future is open, they're just buying time. Piracy can never end because copyright is fictitious. See, I could set up a system where I charge you for air by tracking your every breath, but that would be stupid since air is just available. There is a way tho. Rather, capitalism will most likely look towards changing technology standards and softwares environments to serve their purpose. Forget about downloading applications and looking at source code, the only way to use mass production computers will be through their neutered means: - Only approved softwares from approved "markets"/"app stores" - Settings? "Nah that's for experts" - Ad blocking? "That's a serious crime" - Different operating system? "You can't change that" It's not enshittification its capitalism.

bpt3 1y ago
A major distinction is that someone has to actually produce the content you want to consume, unlike air (though we are trying to make clean air more scarce), which is why no one owns air. How is software, music, or any other easily copied product created and distributed under your system?
- scotty79 1y ago
  Patronage, crowdsourcing and crowdfunding, volunteering. Anything that doesn't require putting a policeman, either real or virtual, behind every users back.
  - bpt3 1y ago
    Sure, that's worked out super well for open source software creators over and over, and they're not taken advantage of in any way.
    - scotty79 1y ago
      People usually avoid getting taken advantage of. Yet, somehow open source software seems to only been growing. So maybe they aren't taken advantage of and something is wrong with your mental framework if that's your perception.
- Atlas667 1y ago
  The same way a lot of cool video content/research/products are: crowd source. Even air can be monetized if you have the right legal team and tech. And we're all random working class people who can't afford a good lawyer even when we need it so... go figure. Copying is built into all of our hardware/software. To keep extending copyright you have to either end privacy or neuter hardware/software.
  - bpt3 1y ago
    So people can create digital things but have no permission to control how their creation is consumed or used? And only digital things have this limitation? Sounds like a recipe for many people to avoid sharing their digital creations with others. And your claim that those are the only two ways to give creators some control over their creations is absurd.
    - Atlas667 1y ago
      That IS the wonder of the digital age. Limits are artificial. Sharing is defacto. A new world is struggling to be born; this is the time of monsters. Capital WILL neuter all software and hardware to make their reality happen. Capital WILL make more and more invasive systems if it means a whole industry can stay alive. They can lobby, we cant. They have the money to influence, we dont. We have voices, but why would they listen to voices when they have profits? Voting with your dollar is the biggest lie out there if you live in a monopoly system where you only get a few options or if you can't afford anything else. They are literally building digital prisons but people say its fine because we can choose the size of the cell and the color of the walls.

bpt3 1y ago

A major distinction is that someone has to actually produce the content you want to consume, unlike air (though we are trying to make clean air more scarce), which is why no one owns air. How is software, music, or any other easily copied product created and distributed under your system?

scotty79 1y ago
Patronage, crowdsourcing and crowdfunding, volunteering. Anything that doesn't require putting a policeman, either real or virtual, behind every users back.
- bpt3 1y ago
  Sure, that's worked out super well for open source software creators over and over, and they're not taken advantage of in any way.
  - scotty79 1y ago
    People usually avoid getting taken advantage of. Yet, somehow open source software seems to only been growing. So maybe they aren't taken advantage of and something is wrong with your mental framework if that's your perception.
Atlas667 1y ago
The same way a lot of cool video content/research/products are: crowd source. Even air can be monetized if you have the right legal team and tech. And we're all random working class people who can't afford a good lawyer even when we need it so... go figure. Copying is built into all of our hardware/software. To keep extending copyright you have to either end privacy or neuter hardware/software.
- bpt3 1y ago
  So people can create digital things but have no permission to control how their creation is consumed or used? And only digital things have this limitation? Sounds like a recipe for many people to avoid sharing their digital creations with others. And your claim that those are the only two ways to give creators some control over their creations is absurd.
  - Atlas667 1y ago
    That IS the wonder of the digital age. Limits are artificial. Sharing is defacto. A new world is struggling to be born; this is the time of monsters. Capital WILL neuter all software and hardware to make their reality happen. Capital WILL make more and more invasive systems if it means a whole industry can stay alive. They can lobby, we cant. They have the money to influence, we dont. We have voices, but why would they listen to voices when they have profits? Voting with your dollar is the biggest lie out there if you live in a monopoly system where you only get a few options or if you can't afford anything else. They are literally building digital prisons but people say its fine because we can choose the size of the cell and the color of the walls.