>They're explicitly defining the hard problem out of existence. A claim is just an opinion, it's not a 'definition' or 'declaration'. That's absurd hyperbole.

>They're explicitly defining the hard problem out of existence. A claim is just an opinion, it's not a 'definition' or 'declaration'. That's absurd hyperbole. If I say personally I don't think the hard problem is an obstacle for physicalism, I'm not defining anything. Let's see what the author says in his introduction to the paper. "Take this with a grain of salt". Hardly the definitive declaration you're railing against.