2 ms·
> It seems like a great workflow to speed up the work of an already experienced translator, but far from being usable by a layman due to the several steps requi
by nottorp 1y ago
> It seems like a great workflow to speed up the work of an already experienced translator, but far from being usable by a layman due to the several steps requiring specialized human supervision.
Just like programming. And anything else "AI" assisted.
Helps experts type less.
- alganet 1y agoMost of my time as a programmer is not spent typing.
- nottorp 1y agoDo you like typing that boilerplate though?
- alganet 1y agoOf course not. I don't like boilerplate code _at all_. I worked with Java for a couple of years. Lots of boilerplate required. The IDE handled them just fine. I never felt I needed something smarter in order to write verbose stuff. My style is completely different though. Whenever I can, I will choose languages and technologies that don't require boilerplate. https://wiki.c2.com/?BoilerPlateCode https://wiki.c2.com/?BoilerPlateCode However, this is deviating from the subject (look at the original post again). We're not talking about dumb, automated boilerplate code. The discussion is much deeper, drawing parallels with tone in translations. We're obviously talking about non-boilerplate.