26 ms·
What in the world are you on about? Editing a comment for clarification is not bad faith. It avoids misunderstanding and helps those reading it, even if some h
by arghwhat 1y ago
What in the world are you on about?
Editing a comment for clarification is not bad faith. It avoids misunderstanding and helps those reading it, even if some have already read an earlier version of it. It makes it sound as if you consider comments a battle, with changes being cheating or foul play, which... Is just wrong.
Nothing about my comment was bad faith or disengenious, nor did I say that I agreed with KiCad developers. I just said that, and will stand by, that it is erroneous to read their claims of e.g. performance issues when using their wayland platform code as being an issue with Wayland. If you write new code that is slow, you don't start by blaming your CPU, then your compiler, then your OS, and Wayland is generally known to perform better than X11 by virtue of being designed by people also working on the GPU driver stack.
- superkuh 1y agoEditing minor bits like typos, or changing some wording isn't, but completely changing your comment an ~hour later after multiple is. And I get the feeling you know that. You're obviously a smart, capable person. I don't buy the confusion. Where did your ">it's easy for others to read this and conflate "problems with application's Wayland support" as "problems with Wayland"." go? That falsehood started this particular comment thread and everything it's about.
- arghwhat 1y ago> Where did your [...] go? That statement is both still there in its entirely unchanged form, and still entirely true - quoting the comment as it appears on my screen right now, long after any edit window closed: > but it's easy for others to read this and conflate "problems with application's Wayland support" as "problems with Wayland"