5 ms·
Because 1) America won’t allow nations near Israel to be successful, it’s too much of a threat to our greatest ally and 2) war is incredibly profitable.
by noworriesnate 1y ago
Because 1) America won’t allow nations near Israel to be successful, it’s too much of a threat to our greatest ally and 2) war is incredibly profitable.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- eddythompson80 1y ago> nations near Israel to be successful, I'm guessing that doesn't include Turkey or the rich oil arab states.
- themgt 1y agoActually they're already "joking" on Israeli TV that Turkey is next, and AEI is on the case making it clear we may need to go to war to take out Turkey next. https://x.com/clashreport/status/1935078004230865094 https://x.com/clashreport/status/1935078004230865094 https://www.aei.org/op-eds/israel-iran-war-dry-run-for-a-future-war-with-turkey/ https://www.aei.org/op-eds/israel-iran-war-dry-run-for-a-fut...
- tguvot 1y agoyou going to omit that erdogan been threatening israel first ?
- tguvot 1y agonarrator yes, he will omit that president threatens another country but will make a big deal out of host on tv show Turkey's president has vowed to "liberate Al-Aqsa mosque" from Israel https://www.newarab.com/news/hagia-sophia-resurrection-paves-way-al-aqsa-liberation-erdogan https://www.newarab.com/news/hagia-sophia-resurrection-paves... Turkish President Erdogan did not hesitate to issue a rare threat to Israel in a party rally, speaking on the ongoing war in Gaza: 'Perhaps we will invade just like we entered Karabakh and Libya' https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/middle-east/levant-turkey/artc-erdogan-threatens-to-invade-israel-just-like-we-entered-karabakh-and-libya https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/middle-east/levant-turkey/art...
- runarberg 1y ago[flagged]
- tguvot 1y ago[flagged]
- runarberg 1y ago[flagged]
- tguvot 1y agoliterally in quote that I gave you, Erdogan claimed that Jerusalem in Turkish. He been entertaining idea of rebuilding Ottoman empire, as of recent. Most of the western countries for example, those that recognized "palestinian state", don't recognize it in any specific borders. Recognizing it without any borders means that they don't recognize that east jerusalem belongs to it. I never denied palestinians of their identity. I presented you with palestinians denying palestinian identity. and btw, Iran - Pakistan relations are so good that they exchange missile strikes in 2024 Iran - Afghanistan relations are so good that they had border clashes in 2023 Iran - Iraq relations are so good that Iran actively destabilizing Iraq and supports various militias there Iran - Azerbaijan relations are, to say the least, strained. And Azerbaijan is famously used as Israeli base for spying on Iran.
- runarberg 1y ago[flagged]
- tguvot 1y agodenying existence of palestinian state is not racist. because it never existed, it doesn't exist now and whatever exist as result of Oslo agreement doesn't meet definition of state. in previous conversation i said that I don't care how they self identify. for all i care they can identify as Atlanteans. On the other side, you been denying palestinians their self identification. this is racist. i gave you two example of prominent palestinians who fought for independence and you brushed them off as misguided. this is literally marginalizing self identity of the people that you claim to be ally of. as example, among those of them who live in Israel (and I think you wouldn't argue with fact that they are same ethnic group) 30% to 60% (depends on survey) self identify as arabs among those who live in west bank/gaza, some identify as palestinians, some as arabs, some as muslims, some as palestinian arabs and some identify mostly with a their clan or hamula (as Mosab Hassan Yousef whom you dismissed claim). and some as all of those things at same time. are they all wrong and you right ? there is a bunch of papers "out there" about evolution of palestinian identity. i'll suggest you to read them instead of harassing a bunch of people here and claiming that they are racists.