I disagree with the sentiment and welcome the future. But I do agree the way the author skips over the reason this exists and the problematic nature of their re

I disagree with the sentiment and welcome the future. But I do agree the way the author skips over the reason this exists and the problematic nature of their readme is a red flag. Either they agree with the dogwhistles or are being intentionally obtuse to proclaim that it's "only about the code". Definitely don't see this project having legs or at the very least not advancing very far.