3 ms·
Try finding an impartial "geek" to set on this jury. Good luck. If Samsung can't convince this lot - they couldn't it seems. So their only hope is the appeals
by crag 14y ago
Try finding an impartial "geek" to set on this jury. Good luck.
If Samsung can't convince this lot - they couldn't it seems. So their only hope is the appeals court. But I got a feeling they'll drop that too.
Samsung's best approach is to pay. And move on.
- nikcub 14y agoI think the argument for infringement is a lot easier to make to a non-sophisticated audience than it is to an audience who understand patents. A non-sophisticated audience can be won-over with pictures showing product similarities and the suggestion of - 'look, they copied!' It is also high on the conscious of American consumers that Apple is an innovative company that is readily ripped off by foreign companies. FWIW I think the patent system is a lot more complicated than what a lot of geeks would understand as well. It really should be decided by a panel of judges and/or experts who can evaluate the case on merits and justify each decision.