4 ms·
On the other hand I only see downvotes and _never_ an answer on how you are using llms. The anecdotal 8hours to 30 minutes PR sounds great, but in my experience
by nevertoolate 1y ago
On the other hand I only see downvotes and _never_ an answer on how you are using llms. The anecdotal 8hours to 30 minutes PR sounds great, but in my experience it just won’t happen. How can you set up llm to work autonomously for _hours_? If it is continuous “pair” work I just don’t see the 30 min work solving a beefy PR. In 8 hours coding with a well thought out plan / re-planning, testing one can finish quite interesting stuff. 30 minutes is basically nothing - and this is kinda what you get with an llm in my experience.
How do you do it?
- infecto 1y agoEither your head is in the sand or you have not been on HN much. Practically every week there are multiple articles that make the front page either for or against LLM tooling, in each of those people, including myself, will share anecdotes from their own experiences. And you will also get a number of folks like the person I responded too who post a negative or positive comment without any evidence or attempt to learn on their own before making a claim. You say you never see people talking about their experiences but there is usually nothing but experiences being posted in these comments every week. It’s an absurd claim. Don’t misjudge me either, I am not suggesting there should not be critical comments but that if you make a critical comment you should at least have an idea what your talking about.
- nevertoolate 1y agoI’m not sure if you have read my question, but I can tell you think I don’t know what is happening in with the llm scene. I’m aware, late? into the game, doing my own experiments. I asked a specific question - have spent ~100 hours in claude chat already implementing production features, prototypes and scripts. Anyways. :)
- infecto 1y agoI read and replied to the bit that matters. Anyways ;)