4 ms·
I wouldn't expect it to hallucinate but how do you evaluate it's ability to distinguish spam from good info? I.e. the "the first four pages of google results is
by majormajor 1y ago
I wouldn't expect it to hallucinate but how do you evaluate it's ability to distinguish spam from good info? I.e. the "the first four pages of google results is all crap nowdays" problem.
- steveklabnik 1y agoBy looking at the pages it looked at and deciding for yourself, just like you would with a web search you invoked yourself. I’ve generally found it to use trustworthy stuff like Stack Overflow, Wikipedia, and university websites. But I also haven’t used it in this way that much or for very serious things. I’d imagine more obscure questions are more likely to end up involving less trustworthy sites.
- leptons 1y ago>By looking at the pages it looked at and deciding for yourself, just like you would with a web search you invoked yourself. Or you could just cut out the middleman(bot) and just do the search yourself, since you're going to have to anyway to verify what the "AI" wrote. It's just all so stupid that society is rushing towards this iffy-at-best technology when we still need to do the same work anyway to verify it isn't bullshitting us. Ugh, I hate this timeline.
- steveklabnik 1y agoYou could. What's correct depends on your needs. Search engines aren't useless because you have to make sure that the pages they return to you are quality, and so neither is using an agent in this way.