3 ms·
Chat just isn't the best format for something that takes 15-20 minutes (on average) to come up with a response. Email would unironically be better. Send a ver
by A_D_E_P_T 1y ago
Chat just isn't the best format for something that takes 15-20 minutes (on average) to come up with a response. Email would unironically be better. Send a very long and detailed prompt, like a business email, and get a response back whenever it's ready. Then you can refine the prompt in another email, etc.
But I should note that o3-pro has been getting faster for me lately. At first every damn thing, however simple, took 15+ minutes. Today I got a few answers back within 5 minutes.
- throw14082020 1y agoDon't you chat with someone over various apps, but then get a notification minutes, hours, or days later? Email is just an instance of chat? So I disagree. Are you building an AI agent accessible over email?
- A_D_E_P_T 1y agoHere's how I view it: Chat is more of a "conversational" medium, where you dash off short and informal messages and expect a very quick if not immediate response. Email is more of a "correspondence" medium, where you write longer and sometimes much more formal messages, and expect a response within ~24 hours. The latter would be the better way to use ultra-compute-heavy/long-delay models like o3-Pro, because you don't expect the flow of a conversation, and it would nudge you to be much more detailed in your prompt. In fact, if it had a larger context window, an email-format o3-Pro would be perfect for lawyers and for certain types of data analysis. I'm not building anything, but if you'd like to, lmk.