>you should not assume that it's better than around 25Mbps down and 3Mbps up It's hard to make a website that doesn't work reasonably well with that though. Ev

>you should not assume that it's better than around 25Mbps down and 3Mbps up It's hard to make a website that doesn't work reasonably well with that though. Even with all the messed up Javascript dependencies you might have. I feel for those on older non-Starlink Satellite links. eg. islands in the pacific that still rely on Inmarsat geostationary links. 492 kbit/s maximum (lucky if you get that!), 3 second latency, pricing by the kb of data. Their lifestyle just doesn't use the internet much at all by necessity but at those speeds even when willing to pay the exorbitant cost sites will just timeout. Starlink has been a revolution for these communities but it's still not everywhere yet.