3 ms·
Yep this is what happened in my home city in india as well. Our property which my ancestors purchased for dirt cheap on the outskirts of the city is now smack i
by porridgeraisin 1y ago
Yep this is what happened in my home city in india as well. Our property which my ancestors purchased for dirt cheap on the outskirts of the city is now smack in the center and valued higher. Populations have also shifted.
We always had a good train network around here. When the shift happened though, the "hub" stations have not really moved. Today the main stations are still where the old center of town was. As a result, taking the train for me is a bit like going to the airport you're gonna have to take a 30min trip(without traffic) and 60min trip(with traffic) or a 30min metro (crowded) or a 45min (but less punctual and gets full too often) bus/suburban train to reach the station.
As I type this, the city keeps expanding on one side, so in a decade's time, there will be a new city center, closer to the airport, but further and further away from the hub station. I'll have to wait and see if they change the hub station to a more central one at that point.
- ethbr1 1y agoTransit is one place where I'll say authoritarianism and central planning are superior. 1. Identify direction of expansion 2. Buy / eminent domain land 3. Build transit 4. Develop area The laissez faire model of urban planning sucks, because it acquires necessary infrastructure after the land needed has already increased in price.
- steveBK123 1y agoNot just increased in price, but the area is now filled with NIMBYs who would benefit and yet will whinge .. therefore immobilizing any attempt to improve transit.