5 ms·
Sorry, I messed up. I misread gitorius instead of gitolite. The tagline is from http://gitlabhq.com/ http://gitlabhq.com/ "Fast, secure and stable solution ba
by AhtiK 14y ago
Sorry, I messed up. I misread gitorius instead of gitolite.
The tagline is from http://gitlabhq.com/ http://gitlabhq.com/
"Fast, secure and stable solution based on Ruby on Rails & Gitolite. Distributed under the MIT License."
Gitolite is GPL2 and Gitlabs MIT. I was just wondering how Gitolite project keeps the license compatibility.
Please ignore my previous comment on AGPL vs MIT, that was due to my misreading of Gitorius->Gitolite. This misreading was probably affected by the http://gitlab.io/ http://gitlab.io/ site where it's said that "Gitlab ... similar to ... and Gitorious".
- sytse 14y agoI'm not the author of Gitlab or a lawyer but I think Gitlab can use a different license than GPL2 because it is not a derivative work, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License#Linking_and_derived_works http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License#Link...