We need more reality-grounded takes like this one. I do have a quibble: > These LLMs also have “agents” - but for the sake of argument, I’d like to call them “

We need more reality-grounded takes like this one. I do have a quibble: > These LLMs also have “agents” - but for the sake of argument, I’d like to call them “bots.” Bots, because the term “agent” is bullshit and used to make things sound like they can do more than they can[…] I'd argue "agents" is actually reasonable technical jargon for this purpose, with a history. Tog on Interface (circa 1990) uses the term for a smart software feature in an app from that time period.