3 ms·
Seems to be taking how old frameworks used to work in the old days (download some html/js and run in an closure) and wraps it into webcomponents. Neat, but not
by mosdl 1y ago
Seems to be taking how old frameworks used to work in the old days (download some html/js and run in an closure) and wraps it into webcomponents. Neat, but not sure why its a paper.
- coneonthefloor 1y agoYea, I feel like we are coming full circle with frontend JavaScript. To me this seems like a concept that has been around a while, but it’s being presented as a novel idea. I’m also baffled as to why it’s a paper.
- lelanthran 1y ago> Neat, but not sure why its a paper. I have a very good reason for that[1]. I will, however, concede that this approach might have been used somewhere public in the past, even though I have no knowledge of seeing this approach previously. A poster downthread mentioned a link that I am going to read up when I have time, that seems like it is the same approach as zjs-component. ----------------------------------- [1] Not "done on a bet", but pretty similar.
- SoKamil 1y agoOkay, but what is the reason? I didn't understand it from your comment.
- croemer 1y agoHe has maybe mentioned to someone that he'll write a paper on this topic
- lelanthran 1y agoAs I said elsewhere: > Posting on Arxiv is a great way to signal that you don't intend to monetise something, aren't pretending to be an influencer and not posing as some thought leader. In short, I'm not trying to build a community, I'm not trying to get followers, I'm not trying to build an email list. I want to publish something to the world, but I'm not going to run the gauntlet of peer review publishing. Arxiv aligns with my goal for this.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]