4 ms·

He was denied entry at the border, so it sounds like he should be let in on a technicality.

• sorcerer-mar 1y ago
  The technicality being "to avoid violating the foundational laws of our country?" Yeah, in the world of law you have to do stuff correctly and technically correctly. What country do you live in where this isn't the case, so I know never to go there?
  • kreetx 1y ago
    He was trying to enter the country and was denied at the border (for a reason we don't know). The technicality being that he was on US soil. Had he been denied entry to the plane at point of departure, would that have been ok?
    • WarOnPrivacy 1y ago
      > The technicality being that he was on US soil. This is not a technicality but an actuality. It is not minutiae; it is key. As near as I can tell you have a strong feeling about this and are trying to find some sort of authority to justify it. The challenge with that: The US Constitution is the law in play; nothing supersedes it. The only possible discussion seems to be You say [thing]. A chorus says "Constitution" because that's it.
      • kreetx 1y ago
        If you don't have a visa, are you still allowed to enter the country if you want to assemble?